|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
138.207.151.18
Good read.
Follow Ups:
Regardless of your take on what's morally acceptable or not, filesharing will perpetuate in some form until musicians stop contributing to this type of database as a way of immortalizing their rarest releases. Anyone in the business of selling consumables online is responsible for keeping their wares inaccessible to pirates. It might take constant policing but the hottest porn stars in particular popular niches know the score and employ watchdogs. Authorities also plant torrents that clue them into potential copyright infringement (sting operations).This particular part (musicians planting their rare stuff) of the what.com website was obviously only a small percentage of the total purpose, but it's like pay to play for a live musician. If one can't generate interest through legitimate moneymaking means they will offer their wares for free, however they can disseminate them, or purchase the means by which they can be noticed.
Pirates will always be scalliwags, cheapskates, and be seen as morally bankrupt for their raping of the art form and its creatives.
http://thewarmteenagetangerine.blogspot.com/
Edits: 11/21/16 11/21/16
Another.
The author puts a lot of emphasis on the variety of the collection and its value for discovering new music. But I suspect YouTube beats it in that respect and is legal.
n/t
SFW?
sounds like bittorrent tracker nonsense, as if we don't subsidize millenials enough. good riddance.
.
Never heard of it...?
This is like hearing about the closing of an exclusive club that I didn't even know existed and would never have been able to get into had I known.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: