|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.2.225.56
Can anyone decipher this?
It looks like the U.S. Jolida won a court victory, or am I mistaken?
"III. Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the Shenda Parties' motion to remand and JoLida's motion for preliminary injunction will be denied, and Prylli's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction will be granted."
"Lock up when you're done and don't touch the piano."
-Dr. Greg House
Follow Ups:
The French distributor could not be haled into a court in Maryland, either state or Federal, consistent with traditional notions of fair play and due process.
JoLida failed to carry its burden to get an injunction.
The motion to remand was denied.
Much ado about not much; no money will change hands between the opposing parties as a result of this, but, to get to the point where some starry-eyed Federal Court law clerk, dreaming of being the next Sotomayor or Kagan, can summon the resolve to distill all the caterwauling (no offense personally meant to anyone including the litigants), most have cost high five or low six figures, or the lawyers are working very cheap.
John Marks
Speaking only for himself
Vanderbilt Law School, Class of 1979 (am I that old?)
# # #
I'm not really sure what anything you just said means.
"Lock up when you're done and don't touch the piano."
-Dr. Greg House
...nothing really happened, but the lawyers got paid. ;-)
But the world keeps turning.
JM
We would like to see an Audio Reviewer in the Supreme Court.
Cheers
Bill
Definitely the right path to The Bench.
Observe, before you think
I read it with baited breath waiting to find out who owns the trademark. You can't help but love a story that has stuff like this in it: "You have just 48 [hours] to decide.... After this deadline, Chen, Shenda, and I will have only one goal in our lives, kill your company by fair competition and replace you in the United States market."
There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in.
—Leonard Cohen
I don't know anything about anything legal, but that document is dated 15 months ago. I'm guessing that if that had been a final ruling, we would have heard about it through official channels (i.e., Internet chat boards!) Maybe??
-Bob
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: