|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.167.222.192
In Reply to: RE: Merman, any setting changes? posted by Audio Bling on June 22, 2016 at 07:52:31
As you can see no reply here. I did not send him a message, I had no reason to
I don't owe you an apology, I stated that I could send a message, so unless he changed his settings, you either weren't able to use the message system, or you didn't try to.
And to be honest if you wont go to AS to send a message, why would you go there to read the reviews. Your concern about giving them clicks, is kind of weak.
That is all my opinion, suplied in a civil manner.
Follow Ups:
Thanks Jeff,
Let's see if I have this right..
I am to be admonished for not sending Mercman a private message on AA (or AS)
BUT
It is OK for you to publically post on AA the implication that I was lying
Putting aside the obvious question of hypocrisy, I will agree with you about your entitlement to an opinion but with proviso. One needs to consider, for example, the now infamous fellow in Orlando had opinions too.. My point is that "civilised" societies are ones where entitlement is balanced against obligation. Your reasoning was speculative at best but this didn't stop you from pushing caution aside. Let's be clear: you were doing the accusing and I was the accused. And you are still doing it: calling my actions "weak"; I would say your account of my actions is weak in that it misses key points. But regardless, you don't seem to get that I don't have to convince you of anything to be accorded respect.
I finally contacted Merccman, he told me he has been receiving messages from inmates in the past.
Anyone who would compare my opinions to the guy in Orlando doesn't seem to grasp the difference between questioning whether you did try to post, and a radicalized terrorist committing mass murder. That you used it as an example tells me you are taking reviews way too seriously.
With a moniker like Audio Bling, I doubt that many take you seriously. I know I don't.
Jeff, again you seem to take what you wish and ditch the rest. I think it clear that the Orlando reference was in relation to the point being made which was about balancing entitlements and obligations not to you personally. I apologise to you if you misunderstood. Please understand I am not your enemy here. Why is it that you want to make me the bad guy; does it relieve you of your obligations? As for Mercman, his post is below; read it. Am I a liar or not? You have again formed your opinion without the evidence (and continue to publish it). Mercman's testimony seems to suggest he is not sure as he reset it. What is clear is that you interpret to suit yourself and, yes, I am serious about the truth.
P.S. Respect to all!
My email was not turned off to my knowledge, but it really doesn't matter-at least to me. Public or private is OK. I did check it and reset it to be sure it was activated,
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: