Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
108.239.61.166
In Reply to: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 posted by digda_beat on February 13, 2015 at 02:48:14:
Completely different approach and overall sound, with some common characteristics.
My observations are below
ELS63 vs LFT-VIII
Differences:
Smoother - Neutral
Top end subjectively reticent - more prominent
No low bass - goes quite deep
Limited maximum SPL - can play quite loud
Slightly easier to drive - needs slightly more power
Narrow sweet spot - not that narrow sweet spot
Maintenance relatively expensive - practically no maintenance
Fairly expensive - fairly cheap
More cohesive - less cohesive from bass to low mid-range.
Need quite a space behind to work - need less space
Common points
Both have quick natural instrument attack
Both are very coherent speakers particularly from low mid-range up
Both are very musical/engaging speakers.
Both work best with tube amps
Both need some space around
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - digda_beat 02:48:14 02/13/15 ( 3)
- RE: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - fin1bxn@msn.com 05:01:50 02/23/15 ( 0)
RE: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - Stale 02/22/15 11:35:16 02/22/15 ( 1)
- RE: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - KotBegemotNY@gmail.com 17:42:22 03/22/15 ( 0)