|
Amp/Preamp Asylum: RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel by Stale Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
For Sale Ads |
68.8.157.213
In Reply to: RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel posted by JohnnyTee on March 26, 2015 at 11:51:26:
With these speakers I would take Quicksilver-s any time over the Moscode. Occasional track that contains extra deep and loud bass that tube amp may have issue with, is well worth fluidity and naturalness that good tube gear brings. Of course, your taste may be different and only you can say what you like more.
But I strongly suggest that you replace ALL the tubes and listen the amp for at least a month before comparing to Moscode.
Last thought: You did not mention the preamp. Can some incompatibility be the cause of the reduced bass quality ?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - JohnnyTee 11:46:46 03/24/15 ( 28)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - JohnnyTee 05:56:38 03/30/15 ( 2)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - JohnnyTee 12:45:43 04/3/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - Mr_bill2 09:35:32 11/5/15 ( 0)
RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - Frihed89 15:29:39 03/25/15 ( 0)
RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - jperry 06:56:15 03/25/15 ( 3)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - Johnny R 06:33:09 04/4/15 ( 2)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - jperry 06:48:17 04/4/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - Jack D II 09:32:24 04/4/15 ( 0)
Replace those 6-year-old KT88s! - samtellig 06:13:57 03/25/15 ( 4)
- RE: Replace those 6-year-old KT88s! - JohnnyTee 09:08:41 03/25/15 ( 0)
RE: Replace those 6-year-old KT88s! - Tubegroover 08:08:40 03/25/15 ( 2)
- RE: Replace those 6-year-old KT88s! - JohnnyTee 09:14:01 03/25/15 ( 1)
- RE: Replace those 6-year-old KT88s! - Tubegroover 20:15:59 03/25/15 ( 0)
Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - Stale 18:59:29 03/24/15 ( 6)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - JohnnyTee 08:48:27 03/25/15 ( 4)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - Stale 11:33:04 03/26/15 ( 3)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - JohnnyTee 11:51:26 03/26/15 ( 2)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - Stale 03/26/15 19:52:32 03/26/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 are 170 W per channel - JohnnyTee 05:54:41 03/30/15 ( 0)
As of late, earlier KT88 versions 120wpc - Craiger56 06:03:28 03/25/15 ( 0)
RE: Quicksilver V4? - M3 lover 16:24:18 03/24/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4? - JohnnyTee 08:31:36 03/25/15 ( 0)
RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - fantja 16:06:36 03/24/15 ( 2)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - JohnnyTee 08:28:48 03/25/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - fantja 13:48:50 03/25/15 ( 0)
RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - BCR 12:27:02 03/24/15 ( 2)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - JohnnyTee 12:29:53 03/24/15 ( 1)
- RE: Quicksilver V4 and ET LFT8b - BCR 12:52:26 03/24/15 ( 0)