Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

How rich can it get?

Posted by Don Till on June 6, 2010 at 07:49:11:

"Let me try a completely different example to illustrate what I meant. It is easy to find a beautiful woman. It is easy to find an intelligent woman. It is not so easy to find a beautiful intelligent woman."

That analogy is so perfect..... As if one might not find a woman beautiful because of her intelligence. We don't all share the same definition of beauty (resolution).

I can conjure scenerios where RFI or other interference could actually be preferable to none and in fact added noise or interference might be perceived as greater resolution. I'm not talking just about masking effects (where noise might mask recording artifacts) that some might appreciate I'm talking about audible noise being percieved as detail.

But alas the analogy perfectly reveals my problem with your original comment.