|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
For Sale Ads |
Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.
Original Message
Re: SImple question, requiring only a simple "yes" or "no" answer:
Posted by May Belt on April 14, 2007 at 10:26:36:
I cannot give you a simple answer because you asking the question in the first place shows that you are not fully understanding the issue.
I do not state that Peter's use of the domestic deep freezer is the same as Meitner's cryogenic treatment. What I am trying to point out is that if EITHER freezing technique alters the 'sound' then the WHOLE freezing issue should be and should have been investigated by the entire audio industry - not just by a few - and that people should be realising that 'there is something going on' which needs investigating !!
I have ALWAYS stated that I believe that Robert Harley's article in 1990 was one of the most significant articles in the history of audio - I use Ed Meitner as one example of how we suddenly realised that someone else (completely independent of Peter) had discovered what Peter had stumbled upon !!!Now, let me explain why I say "that you are not fully understanding or you would not have asked the question in the first place.
Go back 100 years to the first concepts that the micro-organisms that caused septicaemia were 'in the air'. It is like you asking me "Do I think that Joe Bloggs antiseptic treatments are the same as Jack Smiths antiseptic treatments ?" When I have been struggling to try to make people aware that if ANY antiseptic treatments are successful, then people have to begin to seriously consider the "Germs in the Air" concept !!!!
Regards,
May Belt.