Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Re: Stones will set SACD records

Posted by reb on July 31, 2002 at 17:00:57:

Ok Mick, let me clarify. On vinyl I am referring to mint early pressings. And to my ears many of these titles sound just fine. As far as the cd's, the abcko titles sound far better to my ears than the remastered later year virgin titles. In no way do I find these early titles unlisteneable on vinyl or cd. That is the point i'm making- they are not unlisteneable- what have you to say about that.