Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Dual vs. B&O; last time posted by PanzerVI on May 9, 2007 at 19:54:17:
he knows his stuff.I don't think so. First, he recommends some lackluster Japanese junk...with the rare exception of a scant few models he has most likely never seen. Second, he dismisses idlers with his reason being that he doesn't like them. Obviously, he doesn't know anything about idlers. Then, he fails to mention direct driven turntables at all. There are idler and direct drive turntables that handily beat anything ever produced by Pioneer, Yamaha or Sony. For the large part, those three companies concentrated their efforts on producing low and mid-fi equipment. I suspect that is equipment he works on, too.
That tech's information isn't very dependable, in my opinion.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Dual vs. B&O; last time - mosin 21:09:52 05/09/07 (13)
- Re: Dual vs. B&O; last time - PanzerVI 01:07:27 05/10/07 (7)
- Re: Dual vs. B&O; last time - mosin 11:11:43 05/10/07 (5)
- Re: Dual vs. B&O; last time - PanzerVI 21:55:32 05/11/07 (4)
- And... - mosin 10:49:17 05/12/07 (3)
- Re: And... - PanzerVI 23:31:42 05/12/07 (2)
- Re: And... - mosin 07:06:50 05/13/07 (0)
- Just to set the record straight... - George Mann 06:52:04 05/13/07 (0)
- "Name a few?" Oh . . . how does Technics, Goldmun and Teres sound? - HenryH 04:45:11 05/10/07 (0)
- religion? - analog guy 21:24:14 05/09/07 (3)
- Re: religion? - nightdoggy 15:38:14 05/11/07 (1)
- what's old is new... - analog guy 15:56:46 05/11/07 (0)
- Re: religion? - mosin 21:31:20 05/09/07 (0)
- agree completely - Nasty 21:16:09 05/09/07 (0)