RE: Actually, there is science

Posted by Lew (A) on May 6, 2015 at 08:07:47

In Reply to: RE: Actually, there is science posted by collinslaw@fuse.net on May 6, 2015 at 07:07:29:

You could probably "fix" those inner groove problems by tweaking the alignment. For example, the much maligned Stevenson algorithm will produce a null point within or near to the innermost grooves. (I own a few vintage Japanese tonearms that were designed for Stevenson, and with those, the innermost grooves often produce the "smoothest" sound.) But this is not to dispute the obvious point that a longer tonearm will give a flatter arc across the LP surface with commensurately less tracking error, on average.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - 12 in Tonearm - rockpassion 20:04:30 05/03/15 (11)

RE: 12 in Tonearm - majick47 10:10:07 05/05/15 (0)

RE: 12 in Tonearm - AudioSoul 13:58:36 05/04/15 (6)

Actually, there is science - M3 lover 10:10:13 05/05/15 (4)

RE: Actually, there is science - collinslaw@fuse.net 07:07:29 05/06/15 (3)

RE: Actually, there is science - collinslaw@fuse.net 10:26:16 05/06/15 (0)

Lew beat me to it! - M3 lover 10:09:26 05/06/15 (0)

RE: Actually, there is science - Lew 08:07:47 05/06/15 (0)

RE: 12 in Tonearm - rockpassion 14:42:25 05/04/15 (0)

Why a 12" arm? /nt\ - Opus 33 1/3 06:16:25 05/04/15 (0)

RE: 12 in Tonearm - Not Yet There 05:55:21 05/04/15 (0)

I don't believe you will have enough room for a 12 inch arm. - volunteer 05:50:11 05/04/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Actually, there is science - Lew 08:07:47 05/06/15 (0)

RE: Actually, there is science

Post a Message!