But . . .

But . . .

Posted by Langdell (A) on May 31, 2012 at 19:59:43

In Reply to: Exactly. And that is why the CD still lives. posted by rbolaw on May 31, 2012 at 14:53:15:

The average consumer doesn't much care. Many regard their "music" as largely disposable, i.e., they'll listen to their songs that are the current flavor of the day and don't have the audiophile's view toward building a music collection to last a lifetime. And many who do want lasting digital libraries will be content to have them backed up on extra hard drives or in the cloud. I see the CD as soon becoming a niche product and probably going extinct long before vinyl does since I can't see that format holding the same kind of manic loyalty as vinyl.

"Record Are Your Best Entertainment Value!"

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Bromo33333 12:18:09 05/31/12 (12)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Munkie_NL 03:48:12 06/01/12 (0)

Tom's posts here sometimes... - rebop 19:17:14 05/31/12 (1)

RE: Tom's posts here sometimes... - tom.dennehy 13:48:05 06/30/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - dinchart 16:59:46 05/31/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Time_Stands_Still 14:21:14 05/31/12 (5)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Tao 20:40:39 05/31/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - phlogiston 14:59:18 05/31/12 (0)

Exactly. And that is why the CD still lives. - rbolaw 14:53:15 05/31/12 (2)

But . . . - Langdell 19:59:43 05/31/12 (1)

RE: But . . . - rbolaw 11:10:40 06/04/12 (0)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - MillHouse1835@aol.com 13:57:10 05/31/12 (1)

RE: Link: "How Vinyl and iPods Ganged Up to Kill the Audio CD" - Bromo33333 14:17:24 05/31/12 (0)

Follow Ups

But . . . - Langdell 19:59:43 05/31/12 (1)

RE: But . . . - rbolaw 11:10:40 06/04/12 (0)

Post a Message!