Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: RE: Replace 12ax7 with 12at7 posted by Michael Samra on April 1, 2012 at 04:39:23:
Well, as a cathode follower it will always be less than unity gain, so I doubt the mu difference is going to be audible.
The 12AT7 has a much higher Gm though, which may well be audible. I've never understood why Mac ran the relatively beefy tubes (12BH7, 12AU7, etc. ahead of the drivers and then used such a wimpy low transconductance tube as the driver. Especially as the signal voltage drives the power tube grids close to zero volts the drivers are called on to supply a bit of current - and a 12AT7 can do that much better than a 12AX7. The lower output impedance of a 12AT7 follower would be useful in that position I'd think.
But the amp is a classic, so?????
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Replace 12ax7 with 12at7 - Jim McShane 12:23:47 04/01/12 (2)
- RE: Replace 12ax7 with 12at7 - Cleantimestream 18:40:02 04/03/12 (0)
- RE: Replace 12ax7 with 12at7 - Michael Samra 14:04:10 04/01/12 (0)