In Reply to: What was the great answer on the question: "why nobody makes sealed enclosure speakers anymore....?" posted by Eldragon@gmx.com on August 4, 2012 at 11:21:30:
Back in the days of monophonic systems, we tended to have very large, efficient speakers and low-power tube amps to drive them. When stereo came in and acoustic suspension speakers were developed, the trend seemed to be to abandon the large speaker systems in favor of more manageably-sized enclosures because two speakers were needed. Acoustic suspension speakers are less efficient so more power was developed in amps, and we began to see 200 watt/channel solid state stereo amps.
Then, as I understand it, Thiele and Small developed a system of measuring loudspeaker driver characteristics that allowed speaker manufacturers to predict more accurately the performance of drivers in a specific enclosure, after which there seemed to be a growth in ported designs like KEFs 104aB that used a passive radiator or ducted port. These speakers were often more efficient than sealed box designs.
All this being said, I wonder about John Atkinson's comment about no one ever going broke designing a one-note loudspeaker. I guess, to reverse his comment, did people go broke designing sealed box speakers that were not one-note bass reproducers? I understand that JA was partly joking, (I believe he uses PSB Synchronys which have several ports as his current references) but I wonder still if ported designs are so bad, what advantage is there in their use? Are they inherently cheaper to build?
As a fan of ported speakers (I have enjoyed Klipsch Cornwalls, Altec Model 19s, PSB Stratus Golds, Thiel 3.6s and KEF 104aB's (these last two both with passive radiators). I think I know one-note bass when I hear it, and I think many of these designs were pretty successful in avoiding it. Careful positioning of the speaker can enhance or reduce one-note bass for certain.
I considered that one advantage of ported designs was reduced cone excursion in these often more efficient designs and a reduction in distortion products. At least that was Paul Klipsch's contention: that distortion was inversely proportional to efficiency.
Perhaps others would comment.
Enjoy your music!
George
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What was the great answer on the question: "why nobody makes sealed enclosure speakers anymore....?" - George S. Roland 08:08:12 08/05/12 (0)