In Reply to: Here is part two of this review on the 901's $$$$$$ posted by HiFiSoundGuy on March 17, 2012 at 13:40:33:
Interesting that most of the review period was spent with either an old 15 watt per channel, low-end Pioneer receiver or a 35 watt per channel, tube integrated amp. Sounds like they work well with modest power. Of course, from what the salesman at the mall said, the Acoustic Wave music system II might be a better choice. Actually, I'm quite happy with just the smaller Wave music system, but I expect to be moving sometime this summer, and maybe I'll find room to properly place some 901's.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here is part two of this review on the 901's $$$$$$ - jrtrent 10:36:15 03/18/12 (8)
- Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - HiFiSoundGuy 12:54:21 03/18/12 (7)
- RE: Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - jrtrent 18:51:58 03/18/12 (6)
- RE: Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - HiFiSoundGuy 19:49:28 03/18/12 (5)
- RE: Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - jrtrent 06:49:40 03/19/12 (2)
- correction in other forum - jrtrent 05:41:22 03/21/12 (1)
- RE: correction in other forum - Doublej 13:43:14 03/22/12 (0)
- RE: Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - Tom Brennan 20:41:06 03/18/12 (1)
- RE: Part three of this review is coming up next with his reference tube gear and cables..... - HiFiSoundGuy 21:50:15 03/18/12 (0)