In Reply to: Dumb Study posted by Richard BassNut Greene on April 20, 2007 at 12:48:01:
The psychological assessment was just one (and subordinate, sort of control) part of it. What correlated with it (and took priority over it in the evaluation) was two other things: an EEG analysis and a PET measurement in each case. The subjects didn't need to hear any difference and it was even assumed they wouldn't; their bodies registered the variations subliminally, and the structured interview questions confirmed that they indeed had also sensed or perceived (not heard, since this was all ultrasonics) something.The study seems important in the field - even at a superficial look around you can see that it's frequently cited in serious studies and by serious people whom I think you, too, would recognize as an authority.
I think you just have a big bass bias!
TL
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You didn't read it - tlyyra 14:06:59 04/20/07 (24)
- Re: it's frequently cited in serious studies - KlausR. 07:56:30 04/21/07 (8)
- Oohashi - tlyyra 11:28:47 04/21/07 (7)
- Re: Oohashi - Kal Rubinson 15:00:37 04/24/07 (4)
- Not so fast - tlyyra 09:01:10 04/25/07 (3)
- Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 14:07:10 04/25/07 (2)
- Re: Right: Not so fast - tlyyra 16:54:08 04/25/07 (1)
- Re: Right: Not so fast - Kal Rubinson 18:50:12 04/25/07 (0)
- Re: Oohashi - KlausR. 08:30:47 04/22/07 (1)
- Some refs. - tlyyra 13:37:34 04/22/07 (0)
- Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - Richard BassNut Greene 07:26:28 04/21/07 (14)
- Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - morricab 08:05:11 04/25/07 (1)
- Brain scans are not proxies for what we hear when listening to music - Richard BassNut Greene 08:32:32 04/25/07 (0)
- Re: Didn't have to read much to recognize trash -- and here's why --- - David Aiken 13:53:27 04/21/07 (11)
- Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - Richard BassNut Greene 07:57:50 04/23/07 (10)
- Re: Frequencies below 15kHz. mask the audibility of frequencies above 15kHz. assuming they are audible at all - David Aiken 14:04:51 04/23/07 (9)
- Where are the data to prove listeners could hear a difference with and w/o the ultra high frequencies? - Richard BassNut Greene 09:38:35 04/24/07 (8)
- Are these biases? - David Aiken 19:00:57 04/24/07 (7)
- They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - Richard BassNut Greene 08:46:36 04/25/07 (4)
- Re: They are if the study is to correlate with people visiting this website and the typical music they listen to - David Aiken 16:37:15 04/26/07 (3)
- Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - Richard BassNut Greene 07:38:53 04/28/07 (1)
- Re: Because the study results were used by someone here to support the purchase of supertweeters by someone else here! - David Aiken 13:31:08 04/28/07 (0)
- Like we used to say in the seminary - tlyyra 01:20:24 04/27/07 (0)
- Re: Are these biases? - morricab 08:01:55 04/25/07 (0)
- Exactly - tlyyra 01:28:16 04/25/07 (0)