In Reply to: If you did posted by J on March 23, 2007 at 10:28:44:
My original post in this thread wasn't directed at you. You're the one to step in and take arrows for that fella, so don't blame me for "insults" or whatever. You associate yourself with his remarks, fine, but I never asked for a confrontation with you. You've taken it upon yourself to justify and rationalize that guy's attitude.I see and comprehend your points just fine, in triplicate, at incredible time consuming length, through multiple posts and links--and I've told you so. You don't see mine, so what? What more do you want from me?
I have to travel to work this weekend, so I'm outta here. I gotta pay for the braces on my kid's teeth--while I still can.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Look, J - markrohr 11:54:24 03/23/07 (7)
- Wrong - J 14:01:13 03/23/07 (6)
- "morality is difficult to define when the law has not done so" - Todd B. 02:15:55 03/25/07 (1)
- Ahh... - J 14:13:45 03/25/07 (0)
- Great post J - Sordidman 20:23:00 03/23/07 (3)
- Here's the thing - J 13:47:03 03/24/07 (2)
- Yep.... - Sordidman 11:08:03 03/26/07 (1)
- Re: Yep.... - J 15:06:42 03/26/07 (0)