Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Sad indeed - mauimusicman 15:00:30 03/21/07 (81)

• Bit torrents. - j_thunders 20:37:50 03/22/07 (1)
• a warning about Bit Torrent - tunenut 09:44:52 03/23/07 (0)
• Re: Sad indeed - Martin Taylor 13:40:13 03/22/07 (5)
• "maybe they deserve everything that they now have." - musetap 14:09:25 03/22/07 (4)
• Re: "maybe they deserve everything that they now have." - Powerglide 18:12:42 03/22/07 (0)
• Re: "maybe they deserve everything that they now have." - Todd Krieger 15:34:26 03/22/07 (2)
• how music lags behind society... - dave c 19:33:57 03/22/07 (1)
• Personally..... - Todd Krieger 03:42:48 03/25/07 (0)
• "Years ago, college students were our best customers, now they're among our worst customers." - musetap 12:54:00 03/22/07 (0)
• Your use of inflammatory and disputable trigger words - Sordidman 11:04:01 03/22/07 (45)
• Theft is theft. - markrohr 12:28:40 03/22/07 (44)
• Another tool for the recording industry propaganda service -t - Sordidman 12:19:28 03/23/07 (3)
• No, merely someone who makes his living selling intellectual property. - markrohr 13:04:51 03/23/07 (2)
• Don't speak about me, you have no clue who I am... - Sordidman 20:13:07 03/23/07 (1)
• Re: - J 23:51:15 03/29/07 (0)
• Yes they will... - Sordidman 12:18:37 03/23/07 (3)
• "File sharing" . . . what a lovely euphemism. nt - markrohr 12:51:16 03/23/07 (2)
• Tool of the record industry, - much sadder.... - Sordidman 20:08:02 03/23/07 (0)
• Correction: ILLEGAL "File sharing" - J 14:31:24 03/23/07 (0)
• when I was a kid I had a mono reel-to-reel tape recorder - tunenut 09:28:31 03/23/07 (13)
• My sympathies are precisely the same. - markrohr 10:00:31 03/23/07 (12)
• It was NOT fair use - J 10:05:17 03/23/07 (11)
• "I object to the harassment of innocent people to achieve this end" - markrohr 10:13:03 03/23/07 (10)
• It's not a case by case basis, - but an aspect of the fair use law -t - Sordidman 12:20:37 03/23/07 (0)
• If you did - J 10:28:44 03/23/07 (8)
• Look, J - markrohr 11:54:24 03/23/07 (7)
• Wrong - J 14:01:13 03/23/07 (6)
• "morality is difficult to define when the law has not done so" - Todd B. 02:15:55 03/25/07 (1)
• Ahh... - J 14:13:45 03/25/07 (0)
• Great post J - Sordidman 20:23:00 03/23/07 (3)
• Here's the thing - J 13:47:03 03/24/07 (2)
• Yep.... - Sordidman 11:08:03 03/26/07 (1)
• Re: Yep.... - J 15:06:42 03/26/07 (0)
• Copyright infringement is copyright infringement - J 13:42:08 03/22/07 (12)
• A distinction without a difference. - markrohr 14:24:27 03/22/07 (11)
• Lefsetz: "Piracy didn’t kill the major label business model, choice did." - J 18:26:14 03/22/07 (1)
• Perhaps you missed it. - markrohr 05:36:39 03/23/07 (0)
• The headline on this one... - J 18:07:05 03/22/07 (0)
• University of Nebraska takes Wisconsin's lead one step further - J 18:02:49 03/22/07 (0)
• "Whenever this comes up I cannot believe I'm having the conversation" - J 17:53:01 03/22/07 (0)
• I give cover to no thief - J 14:55:03 03/22/07 (5)
• Your Predicament..... - Todd Krieger 04:48:21 03/23/07 (4)
• To whom are you referring, Todd? nt - markrohr 05:22:54 03/23/07 (3)
• Re: To whom are you referring, Todd? nt - Todd Krieger 10:08:45 03/23/07 (2)
• Re: To whom are you referring, Todd? nt - markrohr 10:22:00 03/23/07 (1)
• Re: To whom are you referring, Todd? nt - Todd Krieger 11:31:53 03/23/07 (0)
• Re: Theft is theft. - Tom Brennan 13:13:34 03/22/07 (8)
• Not funny.... - Sordidman 12:25:18 03/23/07 (6)
• Re: Not funny.... - Tom Brennan 15:25:31 03/23/07 (5)
• Hold on just a second there... - J 21:58:05 03/23/07 (4)
• Re: Hold on just a second there... - Tom Brennan 12:49:00 03/24/07 (3)
• Really! - J 14:07:26 03/24/07 (2)
• Re: Really! - Tom Brennan 20:44:42 03/24/07 (1)
• Wrong - J 13:49:17 03/25/07 (0)
• Yeah, no sh!t. - markrohr 14:25:50 03/22/07 (0)
• Re: Sad indeed - David R. in WV 20:52:45 03/21/07 (0)
• MCartney just signed to the Starbucks label. John would puke. nt - Duilawyer 17:00:20 03/21/07 (24)
• That's right! John hated money. nt - markrohr 03:50:11 03/22/07 (0)
• Why? - Bruce Kendall 18:23:33 03/21/07 (22)
• Re: something to celebrate his divorce from Heather Mills. Something hip hop for her...n/t - LongPlay 01:00:12 03/23/07 (0)
• Re: Why? - J 18:38:00 03/21/07 (20)
• Re: Why? - Tom Brennan 00:15:06 03/22/07 (18)
• Re: Why? - J 15:11:32 03/25/07 (0)
• Guess that words like beauty, art, and innovation - Sordidman 11:06:28 03/22/07 (1)
• Re: Guess that words like beauty, art, and innovation - Tom Brennan 13:08:32 03/22/07 (0)
• WOW love your inverted snobbery - dave c 05:14:07 03/22/07 (14)
• Left their roots? Nah ... - SamA 14:57:11 03/22/07 (0)
• Re: WOW love your inverted snobbery - nobody 09:54:38 03/22/07 (1)
• Well, if you mean the most down to earth and least flakey in the face of fame - DAT 12:49:50 03/22/07 (0)
• Re: WOW love your inverted snobbery - Tom Brennan 07:49:13 03/22/07 (10)
• "our versions have done alot less damage to the world than real snobbery and class warfare" - dave c 13:37:12 03/22/07 (3)
• So What's Your Point?? - Todd Krieger 15:17:01 03/22/07 (2)
• who are you talking to? - dave c 19:29:45 03/22/07 (0)
• Indeed - J 15:30:24 03/22/07 (0)
• Off-Topic...... - Todd Krieger 09:24:37 03/22/07 (0)
• You're Mistaking Wealth for Elitism - Todd Krieger 09:02:48 03/22/07 (2)
• Re: The Dixie Chicks music was not political. One statement on the eve of a controversial war was. Even their - LongPlay 01:12:20 03/23/07 (0)
• Re: You're Mistaking Wealth for Elitism - Tom Brennan 09:11:06 03/22/07 (0)
• I'll take John over Paul in New York Minute - Zipcord 08:07:17 03/22/07 (1)
• I don't know. - j_thunders 21:18:01 03/22/07 (0)
• Nice to hear from you, J. - Bruce Kendall 18:55:54 03/21/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• who are you talking to? - dave c 19:29:45 03/22/07 (0)