RE: BTW, that's one of the reasons why record companies should. . .

Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Brahms piano concerto no 2 - Brian Cheney 13:38:48 04/29/12 (32)

This Is So Exciting - Mike Porper 15:38:04 05/02/12 (0)

Serkin/Szell: 2005 remaster - Bob Stern 02:30:20 05/02/12 (0)

Two for further consideration - Poles Apart 12:17:31 04/30/12 (7)

RE: Two for further consideration - Chris from Lafayette 14:16:27 04/30/12 (3)

Who's "Romy" and why does he wield influence? {nt} - Mike Porper 14:58:55 05/02/12 (0)

Romy - Poles Apart 10:00:25 05/02/12 (1)

Interesting - Thanks! - Chris from Lafayette 12:30:12 05/02/12 (0)

Oh, and the timing on the First Movement? - Poles Apart 12:19:16 04/30/12 (2)

I'm going to pull a Brian on this one: Aeschenbacher/Van Kempen - 16:42 - Chris from Lafayette 12:39:01 04/30/12 (0)

Another modern day competition loser! - Brian Cheney 12:23:34 04/30/12 (0)

Available from The Classical Shop as a lossless download... - Russell 09:42:48 04/30/12 (0)

Why would you want to rush through it? - jimbill 19:32:49 04/29/12 (6)

Slow performances of the Brahms Second Concerto sound. . . flabby - Chris from Lafayette 23:36:11 04/29/12 (5)

The teenage Schnabel heard Brahms play live... - Brian Cheney 11:53:01 04/30/12 (3)

RE: The teenage Schnabel heard Brahms play live... - Chris from Lafayette 12:29:59 04/30/12 (2)

ABM in his youth. - jimbill 13:26:20 04/30/12 (1)

RE: ABM in his youth. - Chris from Lafayette 14:05:56 04/30/12 (0)

The Schnabel didn't work for me either. - jimbill 09:15:49 04/30/12 (0)

RE: Brahms piano concerto no 2 - MichaelV8 16:27:40 04/29/12 (1)

RE: Brahms piano concerto no 2 - josh358 18:21:56 05/08/12 (0)

RE: Brahms piano concerto no 2 - Thornhill 15:41:18 04/29/12 (0)

RE: Brahms piano concerto no 2 - ahendler 14:15:28 04/29/12 (1)

RE: Brahms piano concerto no 2 - josh358 18:31:22 05/08/12 (0)

But Gilels and Reiner are 15:43 in the first movement [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 13:54:54 04/29/12 (8)

Gilels/Jochum 18:21 in first movement!! - Brian Cheney 15:52:12 04/29/12 (5)

True - he'd put on some girth by then [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 16:22:22 04/29/12 (4)

BTW, that's one of the reasons why record companies should. . . - Chris from Lafayette 16:33:45 04/29/12 (3)

RE: BTW, that's one of the reasons why record companies should. . . - Old Listener 16:30:12 04/30/12 (0)

Gilels was 42 for Reiner, 55 for Jochum.... . . - Brian Cheney 16:35:36 04/29/12 (1)

There's a threshold in there somewhere [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 16:38:58 04/29/12 (0)

RE: But Gilels and Reiner are 15:43 in the first movement [nt] ;-) - ahendler 14:31:17 04/29/12 (1)

Thanks, Alan - I've just been listening to it on Spotify - Chris from Lafayette 14:37:04 04/29/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: BTW, that's one of the reasons why record companies should. . . - Old Listener 16:30:12 04/30/12 (0)

Post a Message!