In Reply to: Its for security reasons, and for that I am thankful posted by AbeCollins on February 14, 2017 at 13:48:08:
its about I7 and really doesn't apply to the stated scenario anyway. If "some phones" belong to organizatios or individuals with high level of security or whatever that's fine. My scenario is a program that an Iphone owner can only "opt into" for a fee. Anybody that doesn't want to be a part of that program doesn't have to be. I wasn't suggesting 100% compliance by every phone owner. So your article is nice but not germane to my subthread within ths thread. Just Abe touting Apple as you often do which is fine.
ET
"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Good article but - Awe-d-o-file 16:45:57 02/14/17 (5)
- Sure it's applicable... - AbeCollins 17:35:29 02/15/17 (4)
- RE: Sure it's applicable... - Awe-d-o-file 18:19:06 02/15/17 (3)
- RE: Sure it's applicable... - AbeCollins 21:15:06 02/15/17 (2)
- RE: Sure it's applicable... - Awe-d-o-file 08:29:40 02/16/17 (1)
- RE: Sure it's applicable... - AbeCollins 12:32:16 02/16/17 (0)