In Reply to: New "redesign" of LXmini. posted by MikeCh on October 13, 2016 at 09:45:29:
We actually offered to bring our speakers to SL for him to hear, but he declined. It's a tricky thing to make changes to such a successful and highly regarded design, but if we don't try to continue to improve on the concept, then what is the point? I believe very strongly in making your own work obsolete by constanstly looking for holes that can be filled or areas to improve and I feel that SL shares that mind set, even if he disagrees with our particular way of doing so.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 13:22:13 10/13/16 (12)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - MikeCh 14:36:33 10/13/16 (11)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 14:46:25 10/13/16 (10)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Davey 16:43:34 10/13/16 (9)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 07:26:25 10/14/16 (8)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Davey 08:21:23 10/14/16 (7)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Lee M 10:17:35 10/14/16 (6)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 23:50:12 10/14/16 (5)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Davey 08:01:45 10/15/16 (4)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 09:19:36 10/15/16 (3)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Davey 10:20:27 10/15/16 (2)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - OnoYo 23:45:27 10/15/16 (1)
- RE: New "redesign" of LXmini. - Davey 06:28:31 10/16/16 (0)