In Reply to: LOL. Good question. posted by Rick W on February 11, 2016 at 11:03:32:
Alan has posted stuff like this in the past. At some point in the ensuing interchange he usually expresses the hope that at last there will be legitimate scientific support for many seemingly dubious audio tweaks currently permeating the fringier aspects of audiophillia. The more obscure and esoteric the "discovery", the better...probably because there's a lower probability of outright refutation due to a greatly reduced general familiarity with the phenomenon. A longing for objective validation of subjectivity.
IMO, a psychological approach would be more apropos.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: LOL. Good question. - Steve O 16:17:59 02/11/16 (7)
- One can hope, Steve O.... [nt] - alan m. kafton 16:48:41 02/11/16 (6)
- Hope alone is not a strategy for success (nt) - Steve O 17:45:13 02/11/16 (5)
- You presume inaction....different issue. [nt] - alan m. kafton 10:35:53 02/12/16 (4)
- There's serious, legitimate, peer reviewed "action"... - Steve O 11:11:54 02/12/16 (3)
- RE: There's serious, legitimate, peer reviewed "action"... - alan m. kafton 11:31:57 02/12/16 (2)
- LOL...Ain't NEVER gonna happen (nt) - Steve O 12:03:23 02/12/16 (1)
- As I stated before, one can hope.... [nt] - alan m. kafton 13:40:24 02/12/16 (0)