RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - ahendler

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - geezerrocket 14:00:05 10/07/15 (134)

There are two things I know - fin1bxn@msn.com 04:22:41 10/18/15 (0)

"Hi-rez. vs. Lo-rez". Participate in an informal listening test and prove your mettle - genungo 08:00:47 10/10/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - Inmate51 19:34:52 10/09/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - Mr_Steady 16:23:37 10/08/15 (1)

Interesting analogy... - musetap 22:12:28 10/08/15 (0)

When I hear about... - mkuller 14:19:39 10/08/15 (2)

RE: When I hear about... - Tony Lauck 18:54:50 10/09/15 (0)

RE: When I hear about... - Jim Treanor 17:42:56 10/08/15 (0)

"There was a demon that lived in the air." nt - Jim Treanor 09:34:49 10/08/15 (1)

RE: "There was a demon that lived in the air." nt - Todd Krieger 17:31:17 10/08/15 (0)

The "science" is not nearly as interesting as the results of the "listening test"... - genungo 08:34:15 10/08/15 (25)

RE: The "science" is not nearly as interesting as the results of the "listening test"... - geezerrocket 09:00:05 10/08/15 (24)

It says that participants from the Boston Audio Society could not reliably distinguish 16/44 from hi-rez... - genungo 12:56:46 10/08/15 (13)

I read it and I dismissed it - Chris from Lafayette 13:00:12 10/08/15 (12)

RE: I read it and I dismissed it - Todd Krieger 10:03:23 10/09/15 (9)

"I believe the RFI from active digital processing "confuses" the brain"... - Steve O 12:51:55 10/09/15 (8)

Have you ever... - genungo 03:00:21 10/11/15 (7)

That's pretty insidious ... - Steve O 10:35:36 10/11/15 (6)

In this case... - genungo 10:59:15 10/11/15 (5)

Further insidiousness... - Steve O 13:08:55 10/11/15 (4)

RE: Further insidiousness... - genungo 14:54:05 10/11/15 (3)

RE: Further insidiousness... - Inmate51 15:56:38 10/11/15 (2)

Bingo! (nt) - Steve O 16:27:24 10/11/15 (1)

RE: Bingo! - genungo 03:56:12 10/12/15 (0)

Possible... - genungo 13:05:41 10/08/15 (1)

RE: Possible... - Tony Lauck 18:51:16 10/09/15 (0)

Yup - we're all different. As for me, I couldn't dump vinyl fast enough - Chris from Lafayette 09:33:01 10/08/15 (9)

I'm grateful. - jusbe 19:22:58 10/09/15 (0)

I feel the same way, Chris... - genungo 13:04:07 10/08/15 (6)

RE: I feel the same way, Chris... - Todd Krieger 10:43:01 10/09/15 (1)

RE: detail resolution - genungo 02:03:44 10/11/15 (0)

RE: I feel the same way, Chris... - DrChaos 18:04:25 10/08/15 (3)

I feel many things... - genungo 18:23:26 10/08/15 (2)

RE: I feel many things... - Mr_Steady 18:36:00 10/08/15 (1)

The economy... - genungo 20:18:01 10/08/15 (0)

RE: Yup - we're all different. As for me, I couldn't dump vinyl fast enough - geezerrocket 10:09:44 10/08/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - fantja 08:14:24 10/08/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - morricab 01:45:21 10/08/15 (3)

Yep, critical listening a learned skill...(nt) - mkuller 09:45:14 10/08/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - danlaudionut 03:26:32 10/08/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - Todd Krieger 02:02:16 10/08/15 (0)

Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Todd Krieger 23:51:47 10/07/15 (32)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Tony Lauck 18:40:44 10/09/15 (17)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Mr_Steady 05:35:56 10/10/15 (4)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Tony Lauck 09:26:59 10/10/15 (0)

Tastebuds vs. Eardrums? - genungo 06:12:30 10/10/15 (2)

RE: Tastebuds vs. Eardrums? - Inmate51 06:21:02 10/10/15 (1)

RE: Tastebuds vs. Eardrums? - genungo 06:34:15 10/10/15 (0)

"It is debatable whether 192/24 can capture the output of a high quality master tape" - Chris from Lafayette 19:32:40 10/09/15 (11)

RE: "It is debatable whether 192/24 can capture the output of a high quality master tape" - Tony Lauck 20:07:58 10/09/15 (10)

It seems to me that you might hear more of a difference if you reversed the test - Chris from Lafayette 22:27:58 10/09/15 (2)

RE: It seems to me that you might hear more of a difference if you reversed the test - Tony Lauck 09:12:43 10/10/15 (1)

I agree with some of what you say - Chris from Lafayette 17:04:32 10/10/15 (0)

RE: "It is debatable whether 192/24 can capture the output of a high quality master tape" - Inmate51 20:39:12 10/09/15 (6)

RE: "It is debatable whether 192/24 can capture the output of a high quality master tape" - Tony Lauck 10:43:49 10/10/15 (5)

Has anyone ever done an analysis of the absolute limits of analog sound... - Jaundiced Ear 21:35:44 10/10/15 (4)

Yes. - Tony Lauck 08:27:43 10/11/15 (2)

Does that mean that 64 bit DAWs - Jaundiced Ear 19:11:52 10/11/15 (1)

RE: Does that mean that 64 bit DAWs - Tony Lauck 08:05:19 10/12/15 (0)

RE: Has anyone ever done an analysis of the absolute limits of analog sound... - Inmate51 07:08:43 10/11/15 (0)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Dave_K 02:55:54 10/08/15 (8)

I'm sorry, I just have to make this commit/question - Tre' 07:33:12 10/09/15 (5)

RE: I'm sorry, I just have to make this commit/question - Dave_K 10:07:29 10/10/15 (4)

Trumpet Spectrum - Tony Lauck 10:48:04 10/10/15 (3)

Looks like early Miles Davis... - genungo 09:31:32 10/11/15 (0)

Thanks, even more extended than I thought (nt) - Dave_K 09:12:04 10/11/15 (0)

RE: Trumpet Spectrum - Inmate51 12:47:35 10/10/15 (0)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Todd Krieger 10:26:34 10/08/15 (1)

RE: Article Itself Has Some Fallacies...... - Jaundiced Ear 20:47:40 10/10/15 (0)

Todd - I think some of those "fallacies" are covered in the video [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 00:21:05 10/08/15 (4)

What Video? [nt] - Todd Krieger 00:24:43 10/08/15 (3)

Sorry - here's the link - Chris from Lafayette 00:29:42 10/08/15 (2)

RE: Sorry - here's the link - Todd Krieger 01:24:59 10/08/15 (1)

What exactly do you mean by "transient signals?" - Jaundiced Ear 19:27:17 10/11/15 (0)

Crap mastering and recoring - Frihed89 22:47:27 10/07/15 (1)

RE: Crap mastering and recording - genungo 17:55:05 10/08/15 (0)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Ivan303 15:37:08 10/07/15 (32)

nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - mikel 21:20:09 10/07/15 (12)

Mikel and Ivan, turned away at the door of the Magico Room... - Ivan303 07:18:17 10/08/15 (2)

RE: Mikel and Ivan, turned away at the door of the Magico Room... - ahendler 07:26:04 10/08/15 (1)

They went on vacation just about the day I ordered mine.... - Ivan303 08:03:06 10/08/15 (0)

RE: nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - Todd Krieger 23:00:53 10/07/15 (5)

RE: nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - mikel 05:35:02 10/08/15 (4)

Wow....... - Todd Krieger 09:18:44 10/08/15 (3)

RE: Wow....... - mikel 10:24:46 10/08/15 (2)

RE: Wow....... - Todd Krieger 17:25:14 10/08/15 (1)

RE: Wow....... - mikel 20:14:58 10/08/15 (0)

RE: nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - ahendler 21:59:16 10/07/15 (2)

RE: nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - mikel 22:08:06 10/07/15 (1)

RE: nope....hirez is better than 44.1 at the top of the food chain. below that too many variables to be certain. - c1ferrari 22:41:18 10/13/15 (0)

I Think 16/44.1 Sounds Better than 24/192....... - Todd Krieger 19:49:25 10/07/15 (1)

RE: I Think 16/44.1 Sounds Better than 24/192....... - mikel 06:12:11 10/08/15 (0)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - geezerrocket 15:52:42 10/07/15 (16)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Tre' 21:54:38 10/07/15 (15)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Dave_K 03:21:47 10/08/15 (14)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Tre' 16:28:33 10/08/15 (3)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Mr_Steady 17:20:18 10/08/15 (2)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Tre' 18:46:20 10/08/15 (1)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Dave_K 10:10:12 10/09/15 (0)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Tre' 11:49:04 10/08/15 (9)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Todd Krieger 17:48:12 10/08/15 (0)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Dave_K 13:09:48 10/08/15 (7)

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"... - Tre' 14:11:08 10/08/15 (6)

I did some reading - Tre' 15:22:39 10/08/15 (5)

RE: I did some reading - Dave_K 10:09:39 10/09/15 (4)

Thank you Dave and to everyone else, please ignore most of what I've said. - Tre' 17:12:38 10/09/15 (3)

Wish I knew for certain - Dave_K 05:26:11 10/11/15 (2)

Dave, thanks for the education. (nt) - Tre' 16:43:56 10/18/15 (1)

RE: Dave, thanks for the education. (nt) - Inmate51 09:35:36 10/20/15 (0)

High Resolution? A recording engineer told me mp3 is all you need... nt - oldmkvi 15:18:02 10/07/15 (0)

Another "Science-tologist." He focuses on steady-state frequencies and disregards transients - John Marks 14:38:04 10/07/15 (21)

RE: Another "Science-tologist." He focuses on steady-state frequencies and disregards transients - Todd Krieger 20:01:00 10/07/15 (1)

RE: Another "Science-tologist." He focuses on steady-state frequencies and disregards transients - Tony Lauck 18:23:55 10/09/15 (0)

RE: Another "Science-tologist." He focuses on steady-state frequencies and disregards transients - Tony Lauck 19:26:13 10/07/15 (6)

RE: Another "Science-tologist." He focuses on steady-state frequencies and disregards transients - Jaundiced Ear 19:46:51 10/07/15 (5)

Nice musicv. I too am a fan of big band music . . - DRam 12:48:14 10/08/15 (0)

Nice tune. Thanks for the link. nt - Tony Lauck 20:04:26 10/07/15 (3)

RE: Nice tune. Thanks for the link. nt - Jaundiced Ear 20:24:32 10/07/15 (2)

RE: Nice tune. Thanks for the link. nt - Tony Lauck 21:00:48 10/07/15 (1)

RE: Nice tune. Thanks for the link. nt - Jaundiced Ear 21:06:27 10/07/15 (0)

John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - Chris from Lafayette 16:33:36 10/07/15 (11)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - fantja 08:13:40 10/08/15 (0)

I did not see a link to a video and would not have watched it anyway - John Marks 06:23:14 10/08/15 (5)

Never having experienced North Korean Political Re-Education. . . - Chris from Lafayette 09:02:00 10/08/15 (4)

RE: Never having experienced North Korean Political Re-Education. . . - Basslines 11:06:00 10/08/15 (1)

Gosh! Do you think that's what John meant? [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 13:02:05 10/08/15 (0)

Joseph Audio asking for your vote for Best Sound of the Show... same difference - John Marks 10:37:06 10/08/15 (1)

Ah! Now that's something I can relate to! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 10:51:37 10/08/15 (0)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - Todd Krieger 20:04:26 10/07/15 (3)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - ahendler 22:04:31 10/07/15 (0)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - Tony Lauck 20:29:21 10/07/15 (1)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - ahendler 22:06:59 10/07/15 (0)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - fantja 14:15:34 10/07/15 (1)

RE: Attention High Resolution Proponents. Neil Young/Steve Jobs - Todd Krieger 19:54:44 10/07/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . . - ahendler 22:06:59 10/07/15 (0)

RE: John - I agree that bit depth increases seem to be more audible. . .

Post a Message!