Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

RE: "44.1 actually sounds better than 24/192"...

And they could be right.

In the case where a recording master has dynamic range of less than 16 bits and a frequency response less that the maximum covered with a 44.1K sampling rate and where the ADC and the associated DAC at 24/192 creates more noise and high frequency artifact than that of Redbook CD, perhaps yes.

Maybe.

Will a recording played using the 'Worlds Best' 16/44.1 DAC sound better than the same original track up-sampled and played back on the worlds cheapest POS 24/192 DAC?

Maybe.

Am I responding to a TROLL Post?

Could be!




First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.