In Reply to: RE: Why blind listening tests are crucial posted by 3db on March 27, 2015 at 05:07:39:
>This thread is indicating that the subjective camp is far more closed minded than the objective camp. <
You should check out some of the PropHead threads from a few years back.
The true objective camp doesn't accept blind tests as valid unless they are double blind. They believe everything sounds the same except speakers (and phono cartridges) so they devised a test that would help support their agenda. The true subjective camp thinks everything sounds different. The reason I lean towards the subjective camp is because I've proven to myself that some things do sound different, which renders the true objective camp incorrect. So I don't agree that the objective camp is anything but completely closed-minded. Haven't decided on the subjective camp yet. :)
I agree blind tests are helpful. I've participated in many single blind tests. I don't agree they are crucial but a few of them have indeed failed to support my sighted listening. Typically they support the basic differences I hear but reduce the ease of which I hear them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why blind listening tests are crucial - kerr 09:05:44 03/27/15 (0)