Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Fundamentally Flawed "Test"

The notion that evaluating a speaker is possible by listening from another room has multiple flaws, because of too many variables.

Before the "test" proponents get their dander up, I'll say that if you like the way your system sounds from another room, that's great and have fun.

But putting it forward as a test for loudspeaker quality is misguided. There are too many variables in the process, which affect the subjective results. Among them:

The acoustics of the source room.
Shape of the source room.
Placement of the speakers in the source room.
Frequency response characteristics of the speakers.
Directivity of the speakers.
Size and placement of the opening to the coupled room.
Acoustics of the coupled room.
SPL of the system.
EQ of the system.

Some of these variables are outside of our control.

As an example of what I'm explaining, take the K-horns which Brian Levy mentioned. Vintage variations of Klipschorns have a couple of things in common: Harsh and hard midrange, irregular (not smooth) bass, and uneven dispersion vs. frequency. But once these poor attributes have had a chance to have the room's acoustic signature imposed upon them, much like a graphic EQ coupled with some time smear, I suppose they might sound ok from another room.

:)


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Fundamentally Flawed "Test" - Inmate51 10:12:31 01/28/15 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.