|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: About digital recording of analogue sources posted by beppe61 on December 18, 2014 at 01:29:44:
Digital generally is not sweet, present, airy, harmonically correct, pitch correct and tonally accurate but some gets pretty close. Close but no cigar. The biggest selling points (theoretically, at least) for digital are SNR and Dynamic Range. Everything else analog wins. It's not even close. Even Dynamic Range frequently loses to analog these days. You know, what with the loudness wars and everything.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About digital recording of analogue sources - geoffkait 03:13:18 12/18/14 (12)
- Sorry ... i see now "... some gets pretty close ... " - beppe61 04:14:48 12/18/14 (0)
- RE: About digital recording of analogue sources - beppe61 04:04:14 12/18/14 (10)
- RE: About digital recording of analogue sources - geoffkait 06:50:00 12/18/14 (6)
- I agree completely on this - beppe61 01:38:32 12/20/14 (1)
- WARNING!! - geoffkait 13:13:19 12/20/14 (0)
- RE: About digital recording of analogue sources - Tony Lauck 13:50:34 12/19/14 (3)
- " Good ones can not be transferred to 44/16 digital without loss of quality. " - beppe61 01:48:46 12/20/14 (2)
- RE: " Good ones can not be transferred to 44/16 digital without loss of quality. " - Tony Lauck 07:23:16 12/20/14 (1)
- RE: " Good ones can not be transferred to 44/16 digital without loss of quality. " - beppe61 04:45:38 12/21/14 (0)
- I would get a DSD recorder to do LP's n/t - reuben 04:58:28 12/18/14 (2)
- RE: I would get a DSD recorder to do LP's n/t - beppe61 06:17:59 12/18/14 (1)
- RE: I would get a DSD recorder to do LP's n/t - ahendler 08:54:03 12/18/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
