|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: 2nd row, 15' from the quartet. Ansel Adams: bettered by digital photography? posted by tinear on October 13, 2014 at 08:29:45:
Although the science and technology talk would exceed your ability to understand, just know that to actually reproduce what you heard would be exactly the opposite of mono.
You actually need a sound source recorded and ability to be reproduced at every single sound source location(instrument, voice, chair squeek, room reverberation, etc)
Stereo is far better at that than mono, but falls well short of optimal.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- mono would actualy be the least technical way to hear what you experienced. - Edp 10:33:04 10/13/14 (3)
- Well, this may be beyond your ability to understand, too: - tinear 10:59:35 10/13/14 (2)
- "the less equipment and engineering, the better the result" - Chris from Lafayette 19:10:49 10/13/14 (0)
- You just proved my point. - Edp 12:45:17 10/13/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
