In Reply to: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! posted by Potrzebie on September 20, 2014 at 13:26:58:
I think women are simply more "literal" & tend not to have as much interest
in preoccupying their time in the pursuit of activities that don't require the involvement of "others"This is not to say they are'nt interested ,just not as much, as,their
"naturally more social" makeup won't allow them to get that excited about things that are not...well,of a social nature.(Thank God women don't spend as much time thinking in the "me" mode;If that were the case "Civilization" might never have existed)
Edits: 09/21/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - Old SteveA 05:53:59 09/21/14 (9)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - sudz1234@yahoo.com 08:50:40 09/21/14 (8)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - Old SteveA 10:06:50 09/21/14 (7)
- RE: text vs. content: can you explain this difference? [n.t.a.] - wangmr 21:01:37 09/21/14 (2)
- RE: text vs. content: can you explain this difference? [n.t.a.] - Old SteveA 07:44:39 09/22/14 (1)
- RE:thanks for the cerebral-contextual text [n.t.a.] - wangmr 03:58:46 09/23/14 (0)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - sudz1234@yahoo.com 11:33:37 09/21/14 (3)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - Old SteveA 18:14:31 09/21/14 (2)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - sudz1234@yahoo.com 18:33:01 09/21/14 (1)
- RE: Women were never really influenced by home stereo IMO! - Old SteveA 19:32:31 09/21/14 (0)