In Reply to: Wouldn’t it be great to measure overall system improvement? posted by skinzy on July 21, 2014 at 09:34:32:
Hi, i am sure that with a rightly designed series of test signals and the right analyzer (not the human ear) it could be done easily and effectively
The principle is to compare what you send in with what you get out of the system ...
If you send for instance a single tone and you get many other tones at the speakers this is not good ...
I do not think that this is what the audiophile business wants
Kind regards,
bg
Edits: 07/22/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A very simple. effective, objective and reliable method could stop the game - beppe61 04:23:28 07/22/14 (31)
- A "simple" objective test is in fact not so simple. - morricab 14:43:00 07/22/14 (8)
- RE: A "simple" objective test is in fact not so simple. - beppe61 07:39:56 07/23/14 (7)
- RE: A "simple" objective test is in fact not so simple. - morricab 08:04:11 07/26/14 (6)
- RE: A "simple" objective test is in fact not so simple. - beppe61 09:19:19 07/26/14 (5)
- Ear vs. Microphone - Inmate51 14:02:05 07/26/14 (4)
- RE: Ear vs. Microphone - beppe61 02:38:58 07/27/14 (3)
- RE: Ear vs. Microphone - Inmate51 06:04:01 07/27/14 (2)
- " the ultimate test would always be to listen " - beppe61 22:23:34 07/27/14 (0)
- RE: Ear vs. Microphone - rick_m 08:33:22 07/27/14 (0)
- Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - Goober58 11:26:08 07/22/14 (11)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - beppe61 07:44:16 07/23/14 (10)
- Fair enough but it's up to you to do that - Goober58 08:44:01 07/23/14 (3)
- RE: Fair enough but it's up to you to do that - beppe61 10:59:11 07/24/14 (2)
- RE: Fair enough but it's up to you to do that - Goober58 10:22:13 07/25/14 (1)
- RE: Fair enough but it's up to you to do that - beppe61 02:04:05 07/26/14 (0)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - Tony Lauck 08:34:16 07/23/14 (5)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - rick_m 07:48:35 07/26/14 (0)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - beppe61 11:05:19 07/24/14 (3)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - Tony Lauck 12:45:00 07/24/14 (0)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - Inmate51 11:58:11 07/24/14 (1)
- RE: Wouldn't stop anything. Matter of fact people can do what you suggest but don't. - beppe61 23:24:21 07/24/14 (0)
- RE: A very simple. effective, objective and reliable method could stop the game - E-Stat 10:24:53 07/22/14 (3)
- " If it measures good and sounds bad, -- it is bad" - beppe61 07:51:00 07/23/14 (2)
- Sure! (longish) - E-Stat 10:15:27 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: Sure! (longish) - beppe61 08:56:50 07/24/14 (0)
- RE: A very simple. effective, objective and reliable method could stop the game - middleground 05:01:58 07/22/14 (5)
- By the way this is fine if it does not become an obsession - beppe61 08:05:35 07/23/14 (0)
- If that were to happen... - mkuller 12:04:54 07/22/14 (0)
- LOL - it's not the industry's fault you or others don't use measurement when making buying decisions - Goober58 11:32:05 07/22/14 (0)
- Hear, hear!! - rlw 06:03:53 07/22/14 (1)
- RE: Hear, hear!! - middleground 17:50:57 07/22/14 (0)