In Reply to: RE: High Resolution - Fact or Fiction? posted by b.l.zeebub on April 9, 2014 at 06:52:25:
We do a lot of recording at higher bit rates- 24 bit 88KHz is common (this can be easily divided down to Redbook).
When you record at higher rates you sure don't need that brickwall filter. By reducing phase shift in the audio passband there is an immediate improvement in sound, even if the final output is Redbook.
Of course, the highest bit rate we have used is still no match for the LP (we have an LP mastering operation on site in the studio, see the link) in the resolution department. But I have to assume that for this thread that is getting off topic.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- High Resolution - Fact - Ralph 09:57:29 04/09/14 (17)
- RE: High Resolution - Fact - Goober58 07:59:47 04/10/14 (5)
- the best digital still does not match the LP for resolution. - Ralph 10:07:47 04/10/14 (4)
- How do you measure resolution? (the kind vinyl does better than CD) - Goober58 10:53:18 04/10/14 (3)
- That's a really good question! - Ralph 13:05:38 04/10/14 (2)
- RE: That's a really good question! - Inmate51 03:17:03 04/11/14 (1)
- Yes they do. - Ralph 08:25:58 04/11/14 (0)
- RE: High Resolution - Fact - StephenJK 04:17:12 04/10/14 (1)
- We try... - Ralph 08:34:16 04/10/14 (0)
- RE: High Resolution - Fact - b.l.zeebub 10:50:01 04/09/14 (3)
- That is for the preview head only - Ralph 11:46:26 04/09/14 (2)
- RE: That is for the preview head only - b.l.zeebub 07:27:41 04/10/14 (1)
- that's a sloppy way to do it - Ralph 09:30:40 04/10/14 (0)
- Thank you - E-Stat 10:07:37 04/09/14 (4)
- RE: Thank you - Daverz 17:41:02 04/09/14 (3)
- That's not exactly what I was saying. - Ralph 10:19:49 04/10/14 (1)
- "Look at how far computing has come in the last 34 years" - E-Stat 07:37:22 04/11/14 (0)
- RE: Thank you - E-Stat 10:12:26 04/10/14 (0)