In Reply to: RE: No, I don't think equipment designers are stupid. posted by soulfood on June 8, 2012 at 20:22:29:
Every British magazine I ever read at some point had a mention of relative room size and US mags also.
I did not dream that one up and, to me, it makes entirely good sense.
Look at the products from four five decades ago and the pattern is undeniable.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: No, I don't think equipment designers are stupid. - middleground 04:41:34 06/09/12 (5)
- In the early sixties, NINE hundred sq. ft. was the norm. Now, it indeed is over 2200 sf. nt - tinear 17:55:47 06/11/12 (1)
- Obviously, you'll say anything to appear relevant. -nt - soulfood 19:40:56 06/11/12 (0)
- RE: No, I don't think equipment designers are stupid. - soulfood 05:52:45 06/09/12 (2)
- RE: No, I don't think equipment designers are stupid. - middleground 06:50:30 06/09/12 (1)
- RE: No, I don't think equipment designers are stupid. - soulfood 07:18:34 06/09/12 (0)