Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Interesting reading.............................. - Sherwood 15:24:38 03/28/99 (15)

• Re: Interesting reading.............................. - nataraj 19:09:28 03/28/99 (0)
• Without any science luddites here (i.e., those who focus... - Dave VH 16:22:05 03/28/99 (13)
• Re: Without any science luddites here (i.e., those who focus... - john curl 12:42:44 03/29/99 (0)
• JJ Blinks and squints (nt) - jj 18:51:31 03/28/99 (11)
• Actually, I expected some comments from you regarding... - Dave VH 23:51:27 03/28/99 (10)
• My Opinion on Wire - jj 18:15:40 03/29/99 (3)
• Wow, not even flamed yet! :-) - jj 18:20:24 03/29/99 (2)
• Okay. You said "should".(NT) - Paul Willie 00:05:20 03/30/99 (0)
• Why! :-) - Rod M 20:43:12 03/29/99 (0)
• Not a really easy subject to discuss - jj 07:54:56 03/29/99 (5)
• didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - petew 16:28:02 03/29/99 (4)
• Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - abc 02:13:35 03/30/99 (2)
• Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - Monty 19:35:16 04/04/99 (1)
• Distortion is INFORMATION loss - jj 21:57:13 04/04/99 (0)
• I've no idea, sorry (nt) - jj 18:11:05 03/29/99 (0)

Follow Ups

• Okay. You said "should".(NT) - Paul Willie 00:05:20 03/30/99 (0)