In Reply to: JJ Blinks and squints (nt) posted by jj on March 28, 1999 at 18:51:31:
general audio/scientific perspectives on the two phenomena I mentioned. I cannot believe that they are as controversial as wire vs. wire. (And I'm sure you have done more than blinking and squinting to hold your tongue on the wire and certain other threads here at the Asylum that have at the most, very tenuous support by the audio scientific community.)I always appreciate your scientific insights, and your contributions on less controversial issues.
Dave VH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Actually, I expected some comments from you regarding... - Dave VH 23:51:27 03/28/99 (10)
- My Opinion on Wire - jj 18:15:40 03/29/99 (3)
- Wow, not even flamed yet! :-) - jj 18:20:24 03/29/99 (2)
- Okay. You said "should".(NT) - Paul Willie 00:05:20 03/30/99 (0)
- Why! :-) - Rod M 20:43:12 03/29/99 (0)
- Not a really easy subject to discuss - jj 07:54:56 03/29/99 (5)
- didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - petew 16:28:02 03/29/99 (4)
- Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - abc 02:13:35 03/30/99 (2)
- Re: didn't JG Holt discuss this once in Stereophile? - Monty 19:35:16 04/04/99 (1)
- Distortion is INFORMATION loss - jj 21:57:13 04/04/99 (0)
- I've no idea, sorry (nt) - jj 18:11:05 03/29/99 (0)