Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

RE: Low-rez DSD conversion a common thing since the 1980's?

Hi,

DSD was developed in part because in the 90's Delta Sigma ADC's (which output "DSD" naturally) and Delta Sigma DAC's (which need a "DSD" input) became common.

With CD the ADC had it's DSD output converted to PCM and the DAC received PCM and had to internally convert to DSD. So you had:

ADC-DS(S) -> Conversion to PCM -> CD -> Conversion to DS(D) -> DAC-DS(D)

You may find this little sidebar to an interview illuminating:

http://www.audiostream.com/content/qa-thorsten-loesch-amrifi-audiostream-addendum-pcm-vs-dsd

As to "Why no-one knows?"...

Well, those "PCM to DSD" converting DAC Chips did not have a big advertisment "Converts PCM to DSD", but instead were called "Mash" (pronounce Mush) by Technics, or "Bitstream" (pronounce Bitscream) by Philips, Pulseflow (pronounce Pulsesslow) by Sony and so on...

So while they actually did "PCM -> 2 -> DSD" in hardware, someone forgot to mention the fact (perhaps because DSD was still a decade away... Hehehe.

:-P
Thor

At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: Low-rez DSD conversion a common thing since the 1980's? - Thorsten 18:11:27 08/10/16 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.