In Reply to: For the same reasons that...... posted by Chris Garrett on March 12, 2001 at 14:29:41:
Chris, thanks for that explanation. Superb !All that said, doesn't it seem a bit dishonest the way 24/96 is being thrown around these days ? I mean, I read a lot and I am just now understanding how all of this stacks up. Sounds like a lot of marketing hype to me.
Up until DVD-A and SACD how many levels of encoding resolution were there ? And now that I have a used Link DAC II on the way, what is it that is creating the sonic benefits reviewed ad infinitum ? Lower jitter or what ?Again, thanks for the help.
bw
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: For the same reasons that...... - renaissance 16:07:30 03/12/01 (4)
- Sorry, didn't answer the last part..... - Chris Garrett 18:06:31 03/12/01 (1)
- Re: Sorry, didn't answer the last part..... - garth 03:06:39 03/13/01 (0)
- Well here's the kicker..... - Chris Garrett 16:38:36 03/12/01 (1)
- Re: Well here's the kicker..... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 18:58:46 03/12/01 (0)